Blog

Current Trends Affecting Pricing of Financial Transactions

Blog

Current Trends Affecting Pricing of Financial Transactions

Blog

Current Trends Affecting Pricing of Financial Transactions

Blog

Current Trends Affecting Pricing of Financial Transactions

Blog

Current Trends Affecting Pricing of Financial Transactions

Why you should download

Why you should watch

Current Trends Affecting Pricing of Financial Transactions

13.1.2023

Surviving the Storm: Strategies for Managing Financial Transactions in a Volatile Economic Climate

During 2022 international businesses continued to be exposed starkly to changing macroeconomic conditions, with Europe now battered by war after recovery from Covid-19. Compared to the preceding roughly 10 years of low interest rates and relatively stable economic conditions, the situation in January 2023 in the Euro Area is marked by rising inflation, rising interest rates, and a tanking business and consumer confidence (see graphs below).

Harmonized Index of Consumer Prices (HICP), Eurostat (Dec 2022), sourced from European Central Bank Inflation Dashboard, January 4th 2023

Euro Short-Term Rate (EST) — Overnight borrowing of financial corporations at 25th percentile of volume, sourced from European Central Bank, January 4th 2023


Consumer Confidence Index (CCI) for Euro Area countries, sourced from Business Tendency and Consumer Opinion Surveys, OECD (2023), January 4th 2023

The graphs reflect what is happening in the real world with recent developments causing dire impacts on lives, jobs, prices, supplies, etc. It seems subordinate to talk about corporate compliance and only makes sense because work is necessary to abide by the rules that we have set internationally and fulfill the function we have assigned to compliance in society (stability, predictability, trust, etc.).

In this post, we will review the specific economic variables affecting financial transactions and provide practical suggestions on analyzing and responding to these changes to ensure your transfer pricing is still compliant with the arm’s length principle.

So let’s get started. First, we need to review which of the current changing market variables impact existing group financial transactions (FT) or the group policy. Below is a list of economic variables that will impact certain aspects of your comparability analysis for transfer pricing purposes.

1) Rising central bank lending rates and interbank reference rates
  • Rising base rates directly impact the price of FTs that contain a variable interest component (floating interest rates). Scan your FTs that move relative to interbank offering rates (IBOR) or alternative reference rates (ARR), considering the phase-out of IBORs.
  • Assess the analyses of the group’s FTs for conclusions made on financing options realistically available. Consider whether previously opted out financing options are now considerably more attractive from the lender’s or borrower’s perspective.
  • Intercompany financial agreements may include clauses that are triggered when certain levels of reference interest rates are hit.
  • Some intercompany agreements reserve the right to renegotiate the pricing and terms and open up planning opportunities to benefit from changing market conditions.
2) Reshuffling of prices in markets for fixed income (bonds, loans, etc.), foreign exchanges, financial swap agreements, etc.
  • The pool of potentially comparable financial instruments can be significantly altered, which is the most significant factor affecting your interest rate range.
  • Changes in benchmark curves (such as Bloomberg’s corporate sector curves), currency and interest rate swaps, etc., impact comparability adjustments that shape your interest rate range.
  • Reshuffling of markets may indirectly open new options realistically available. For example, the Swiss Franc is around its all-time high against the Euro, which warrants a review of regional financial conditions.
3) Deteriorated business financials and weakened economic outlooks
  • Check Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch for any updates on the group’s (parent) rating, which affects notching for implicit support and instrument rating.
  • Your issuer credit rating analysis may be revised in hindsight for different reasons. Where this might be the case, a risk exposure analysis can help assess how current market circumstances alter, for example, the borrower’s projections. This especially applies where historic years have been (partially) used to compute an issuer rating.
  • Similarly, the debt capacity analysis may be revisited in light of changed business financials. Your tested party may stack up differently to the computed ratios of your comparables. This may affect the characterization of your FT and, in a worst-case scenario, lead to a full or partial re-characterization for transfer pricing purposes from intercompany debt to equity.
  • In cases where you are using a simplified credit rating to interest matrix as a starting point to compute an arm’s length range, all of the above factors should measurably impact the updated rates on the matrix.
  • Check group financing agreements and term sheets for any thresholds that may be reached because of changed business financials. Staying on top and following contractual terms reduces the exposure to related transfer pricing adjustment risks.

Once all market variables impacting FTs have been identified, the second step is to assess the impact or the materiality of the effects on the transfer pricing comparability analysis.

Transfer pricing software can help in this regard. Get in touch with AIBIDIA to assess whether our FT modules fit your purposes.

Meet the authors

Author
Max Stobbe
Digital TP Lead Western Europe

Max Stobbe is a Digital Transfer Pricing Lead at Aibidia, where he focuses on product development. With years of experience working on transfer pricing documentation and planning for Silicon Valley-based multinationals, Max is an expert in his field. As a Digital Transfer Pricing Lead at Aibidia, Max uses his expertise to develop the company's cutting-edge digital transfer pricing platform. With a deep understanding of the complexities of transfer pricing, Max is able to push the boundaries of what is possible, creating solutions that are efficient, effective, and relevant for transfer pricing management.

Transform your approach to transfer pricing now

Cancel anytime. Backed by TP experts.
7-day free trial
Set up instantly
Up-to-date, accurate answers
REPORTS

Current Trends Affecting Pricing of Financial Transactions

Hereʼs Why You Should Get the Report

0

See how peers are adapting to global change

Understand how 140+ MNEs and advisory firms are responding to shifting regulations, heightened audit scrutiny, and technology-driven change, and where your approach stands in comparison.

0

Learn how others are driving compliance

Explore the approaches to resourcing, data management, and operational transfer pricing that teams are using to tackle growing workloads.

0

Identify emerging trends shaping the profession

Gain insight into how AI, automation, and operating models are redefining transfer pricing, so you can plan for the skills, tools, and processes youʼll need next.

Insights

What youʼll learn inside the Aibidia report 2025

The rising cost of tax scrutiny
01

The rising cost of tax scrutiny

Heightened tax authority demands are driving up the time and money TP teams spend on audits. Companies with stronger documentation processes, centralised data, and proactive OTP practices are better positioned to contain both costs and risk.

02

The state of OTP maturity

Only 35% of companies have a well-defined OTP process, while 24% have none at all. Barriers to OTP maturity include poor data access, complex business models, and limited coordination between tax, finance, and IT.

03

The importance of structured data

With 72% of companies in fragmented data environments, the report shows how centralised data helps TP teams insource more processes, ensure consistent compliance, and handle audits more efficiently.

04

Technology and AI adoption in practice

42% of MNEs are investing in specialist software, reducing reliance on traditional tools. AI interest is steady rather than explosive, hinting that TP teams need clean, structured data before advanced analytics can add value.

Download the report

Submit the form below to access your report.

By submitting this form, I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy and agree to the processing of my personal data by Aibidia for the stated purposes.
Thank you! The report will be sent to your inbox.

Expert insights

Structured, reliable data is essential for executing a consistent, defensible transfer pricing strategy. Common barriers to structured data include siloed legacy source systems, unclear data ownership, and inconsistent definitions across entities and functions.

Prasad Parwidala
Head of Professional Services, Aibidia
Read the case study

We see significant variation in OTP maturity across companies. In many cases, if existing processes appear to work, there’s less motivation to change. However, where we see this changing, is within MNEs that have faced increased scrutiny or operate with more complex structures.

Pia Honkala
Global Commercial Head - Operational Transfer Pricing, Aibidia
Read the case study

While there are many challenges in accessing the right data for TP calculations and analysis, one of the most significant barriers to OTP adoption can be the misalignment of KPIs between Finance and Tax teams.

Marlon Manto
Director, Transfer Pricing Advisory, Aibidia
Read the case study

We’re seeing practical AI adoption in areas such as navigating country-specific documentation requirements, researching transfer pricing methods, comparing jurisdictional rules, and tracking global compliance timelines.

Maria Helander
VP Product, Aibidia
Read the case study